Multi-Center Prospective Study Evaluating an AI-Enabled Clinical Decision Support Tool To Improve Biomarker Testing in Early-Stage NSCLC
ASCO 2026
Melina Elpi Marmarelis, Jessica Dow, Journey Penney, Binyam Yilma, Alexis Aiello, Marina Codari, Chithra Sangli, Karen Huelsman, Andrew J. Parchman, Charu Aggarwal, Sarah Grace Thompson, Natraj Reddy Ammakkanavar, George R. Simon, Amol Rao, Gautum Agarwal, Ezra E.W. Cohen, Jyoti D. Patel, Noah Zimmerman
Background
Non-adherence to guideline-concordant biomarker testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can limit access to targeted therapies and adversely impact survival. We evaluated an AI-enabled clinical decision support (AI-CDSS) program comprising: (1) education around baseline testing rates; (2) continuous monitoring to generate real-time alerts for eligible patients with missing biomarker testing; and (3) longitudinal feedback via dashboards. Here, we report the effectiveness of this program in identifying and closing biomarker testing gaps for patients with early-stage NSCLC.
Methods
In this descriptive study, we analyzed patients with confirmed NSCLC across 6 geographically and socioeconomically diverse US community health systems. The AI-CDSS identified early- stage patients eligible for biomarker testing (eNSCLC as AJCC 8th edition Stg IB-IIIB (T3, N2) with planned curative intent treatment). Biomarker testing included EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1. We compared testing adherence between a baseline period (BL: 24 months through 3 months prior to the health system-specific roll-out) and a post-launch period (PL: roll-out through Oct 2025). The AI-CDSS was implemented on a rolling basis across health systems (BL from Feb 2022 – Dec 2024 and the PL from Feb 2024 – Oct 2025). Testing rates were calculated as the proportion (%) of patients with complete testing within 90 days of pathologic diagnosis in each period. The improvement in test rates (absolute lift) is calculated as the difference in PL – BL testing percentages in the two periods.
Results
A total of 662 patients with eNSCLC (270 BL and 392 PL) were included in the analysis. Patients were predominately white (85%), had a history of smoking (88%), with a median age of 70 years at diagnosis. The stage distribution was as follows: Stage III (34%), Stage II (37%), Stage IB (25%), and Stage IB or IIA [indeterminate] (5%). The absolute lift in biomarker testing within 90 days of pathologic diagnosis before vs after intervention was 18% for EGFR, 24% for ALK, and 13% for PDL1 biomarkers. Among patients with molecular testing who received adjuvant treatment, 89% were on guideline-concordant adjuvant treatment.
**Conclusions
**Implementation of an AI-CDSS was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in rates of biomarker testing for eNSCLC and resulted in high concordance with guideline-directed adjuvant therapy. Appropriate and timely biomarker testing is essential for perioperative treatment planning. This study provides preliminary evidence that AI can use complex electronic health records to provide real-time interventions that can promote guideline-concordant care.
Table 1: Testing Gap Results
| Disease State | Biomarker | Baseline N | Baseline Test Rate | Post Launch N | Post Launch Test Rate | Absolute Lift |
| eNSCLC | EGFR | 264 | 49% | 392 | 67% | 18% |
| ALK | 270 | 43% | 389 | 67% | 24% | |
| PD-L1 | 270 | 59% | 389 | 72% | 13% |
Related publications