01/05/2026

Molecular Characterization of Resected Non-Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (PC) Based on KRAS Status

ASCO GI 2026 PRESENTATION
Authors Angelo Pirozzi, Ellen B. Jaeger, Cody Eslinger, Stamatina Fragkogianni, Unnati Jariwala, Arya Ashok, Naohiro Okano, Celine Hoyek, Taro Shibuki, Binbin Zheng-Lin, Oluseyi Abidoye, Daniel H. Ahn, Christina Wu, Mohamad Bassam Sonbol, John H. Strickler, Takayuki Yoshino, Masafumi Ikeda, Lorenza Rimassa, Mitesh J. Borad, Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab

Background: Surgery is the only potentially curative option for PC. However, only a minority of patients (pts) undergo resection with current perioperative (periop)-chemotherapy (CT). In the absence of phase III trials, selection between mFOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (gem-nab) is based on limited evidence. We assessed whether NGS–based tumor profiling can guide tailoring of CT.

Methods: pts with resected PC (resectable, borderline resectable, and downstaged locally advanced) that underwent Tempus xT, xF (DNA), and/or xR (RNA) testing were selected (89% tissue, 11% blood). Most samples (73%) were collected post-CT. Samples were stratified by KRAS status into KRAS-mutated (KRASmut) and KRAS wild-type (KRASwt). PD-L1 IHC was reported as tumor proportion score (TPS). Primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS) defined from CT initiation to death with censoring of pts alive at the last follow-up or at a study cutoff of 5 years. Secondary endpoint was molecular profiling by KRAS status. Pearson chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for descriptive comparisons; univariate Cox regression and log-rank tests (p < 0.05) for survival.

Results: We included 1,325 pts (median age 66 years [IQR 59–72]) with resected PC [stage II (15%), stage III (12%) and stage I (10%), unknown (62%)]. 95% had adenocarcinoma. Pts received neoadjuvant (50%), neoadjuvant plus adjuvant (26%), neoadjuvant with indeterminate adjuvant allocation (13%) or adjuvant CT (11%). First-line periop-CT was mFOLFIRINOX in 73% and gem-nab in 27% (median duration 4.3 months (mo) [range, 2.6–6.7]). KRAS mutations were present in 75% (G12X 91%: G12D 44%, G12V 34%, G12R 21%, G12C < 1%). mOS was 26.7 mo (95%CI, 22.4-35.7) in the total cohort; KRASmut pts showed a clinically meaningful worse mOS compared to KRASwt [24.1 vs 35.7 mo; HR 1.61 (95%CI, 0.98 – 2.63); p = 0.06]. In the KRAS G12D pts, mFOLFIRINOX showed a trend towards longer mOS compared to gem-nab [17.79 vs 14.53 mo; HR 0.75, (95% CI, 0.56 – 1); p = 0.050]; no significant differences were observed in other KRAS subgroups. Compared to KRASwt, KRASmut pts were enriched for TP53 (76% vs 22%; p < 0.001), SMAD4 (28% vs 5.8%; p < 0.001), CDKN2A (33% vs 8.5%; p < 0.001), MTAP deletions (7.7% vs 1.2%; p < 0.001), and chromatin-regulator alterations (ARID1A 7.8% vs 1.2%; p < 0.001; KMT2C 2.5% vs 0.6%; p = 0.034). KRASwt pts were enriched for BRAF V600E (1.5% vs 0%; p < 0.001). PD-L1 TPS ≥1% was more frequent in KRASmut compared to KRASwt (11.0% vs 8.1%; p = 0.033).

Conclusions: KRAS status does not predict benefit from mFOLFIRINOX vs gem-nab in resected PC. Interestingly, resected PC showed a higher prevalence of KRASwt compared to the metastatic setting. KRAS status is associated with distinct profiles of potentially targetable co-alterations. These findings may suggest the integration of genomic profiling in clinical trials to develop biomarker-driven tailored strategies in the early stage.

VIEW THE PUBLICATION